The 9-11 attacks were the pretext which sold the myth of evil Muslim terrorists imminently threatening Americans. That tale allowed the Cheney-led members of the Project for the New American Century (PNAC) to implement their 1990 DPG plan for world control. The “war on terror” has nothing to do with protecting the U.S
…However, terrorism has never posed a serious threat to American people. The chance of dying of a terrorist attack in the United States has always been virtually zero, even in 2001. (Moore, 2003, pp. 96-97).
Even if the 9-11 attacks had been perpetrated without U.S. collusion (which is highly unlikely), they did not qualify as a threat significant enough to turn the U.S. and its allies into security states, trampling international law and Constitutional protections, much less as a justification for launching unprovoked military conquests of Afghanistan and Iraq. For the victims, their families, and their communities, the 9-11 events were a horrific tragedy. But as shocking as they were, many 9-11 family members felt strongly that they did not justify vengeful, military assault:
Peaceful Tomorrows members have asked that violent responses to the September 11 tragedies, such as the US bombing campaign in Afghanistan, not be done in their names and the names of their loved ones. Members say they were concerned…
More:
Islamophobia and the "War on Terror": the Continuing Pretext
- Related posts on in iraq
- What is the latest news on the war in Iraq? | CHIPDIR - Daily News
- Religion Plays A Lesser Role In Iraq's Election Season | Mumbai …
- werewolf » The Hurt Locker: In Praise of War (Films)
- Related posts on the cause of the civil
- Week of February 5, 2010
- Related posts on wwii statistics
- Should I Go See Inglourious Basterds? | Conservative Heritage Times
Related posts: